Home > Knowledge > Blog

The True Cost of Managed Review: It’s Not What You Think

Oct 24, 2022

Bargain-basement document review rates have fallen to surprising levels. But the true cost is higher. Much higher.

In our industry, there seems to be a market reflex for commoditized services. Potential new customers of alternative legal services providers like Level Legal often say, “What are your hourly rates? Our clients are cost-conscious.”

Level Legal customers rarely ask about our rates after our initial engagement. They have come to understand focusing on a single rate as the primary driver of total project cost pursues the issue from the wrong perspective, like choosing a restaurant based on only the price of a drink; first-pass-review rates are often the drink prices of managed review.

Consider this non-exhaustive list of document review costs that rarely appear on a spreadsheet:

• Back-end costs often overtake front-end costs. The lowest rates on first-pass review often go along with the highest law firm and in-house quality control costs (see 2c on “Discovery” in Bohannon v. Facebook, Inc.). The problem only gets worse when client and counsel teams need to step in to clean up messes. Paying a little extra for quality managed review is a rounding error compared to the expense of partners, associates, and legal staff. Many of our AmLaw customers note their time – often at $500-$1,000 per hour – spent babysitting or correcting sloppy review is economic insanity. Think total cost instead.

• Countermeasures take a toll. When law firms can’t fully trust review teams, they often step in to handle last-mile tasks like quality control, redactions and privilege logs, and fact development. This approach comes at great expense and opportunity cost. Ask yourself: Is my investment in law firm expertise allocated to driving the matter forward on the merits or mitigating the risks associated with budget review?

• Avoidable rework adds up. Discovery is a verb and managed review is a process, not an event. Great review teams have the experience and time horizon to ask the right questions to efficiently guide counsel through the iteration, calibration, and pivots inherent to complex review. Relying on providers that surface scope changes when it’s too late to control leads to budget overrun. Most rework is avoidable with strategic perspective and a razor-sharp project plan designed around your outcomes.

• The isolated review set should never be the final review set. Instead of taking on first-pass review sets as identified, service-oriented providers recommend bold dataset reduction strategies and workflow efficiencies to further control volume. The result? Defensible exclusions, big savings, and recaptured time.

• It can get worse. We’ve all seen the national news stories: Poor document reviews can lead to missing smoking guns, exposure of sensitive information, sanctions from the court, and being rocked back on your heels during discovery.

By now, you should have a sharper focus on the total cost of managed review projects. The only remaining question is what to do. When outsourcing, focus more on the quality of the team the rate gets you, not just the hourly rate. If you must choose a low-cost provider, ask the candidates about their recruiting processes; many reviewers come from agencies that know little to nothing about managed review and discovery outcomes. Try to determine the rigor of their onboarding processes. Request to meet with the team and pay attention to your gut reactions. Don’t settle for good enough.

The true cost of managed review includes a lot more than you think. One way to remember that is with a saying that could have been invented for the topic: You get what you pay for.

To learn how Level Legal keeps the total cost of managed review down, contact us today.

Daniel Bonner is the MacGyver of Level Legal. There’s nothing the director of client solutions can’t figure out, from housebuilding to vehicle restoration to precision shooting. At work, he pays careful attention to details and communicates clearly with clients to deliver the delightful service our customers have come to expect.

Explore More
Close Modal

Our Framework

Understand.

During this phase, we work to step away from any assumptions and guesses about what our customers needs, and let our research findings inform our decision-making. We learn more about our customers, their problems, wants, and needs, and the environment or context in which they will use the solution we offer.

Our Framework

Define.

During the Define phase, we analyze our research findings from the Understand phase and determine what is the most important problem to solve — and why. This step defines the goal. Then we can give a clear problem statement, describing what our customers’ needs are that we are trying to solve, making sure that we heard and defined their problem correctly.

Our Framework

Solve.

This phase is an important part of the discipline in our process. People often settle for the first solution, but the most obvious solution is often not the right one. During the Solve phase, we brainstorm collaboratively with multiple stakeholders to generate many unique solutions. We then analyze our potential solutions and make choices about which are the best to pursue based on learnings in the Understand phase.

Our Framework

Build & Test.

This phase is critical in developing the right solution to our customers’ problem. An organized approach to testing can help avoid rework and create exceptional outcomes. Starting small and testing the solution, we iterate quickly, before deploying solutions across the entire project.

Our Framework

Act.

During this phase, the hard work of prior phases comes to life in our customers’ best solution. The research, collaboration, and testing performed prior to project kick-off ensure optimal results.

Our Framework

Feedback.

At the project completion, we convene all stakeholders to discuss what went well, what could have been better, and how we might improve going forward. We call these meetings “Retrospectives,” and we perform them internally as a project team, and with our external customers. The Retrospective is one of the most powerful, meaningful tools in our framework.

Next