Home > Knowledge > Blog

Data Concentration Expected to be a Focus of Antitrust Scrutiny

Aug 16, 2022

No acquisitions have reportedly been scuttled because of a company’s digital practices, but agencies have been told to look at the competitive impact of the combined company’s user knowledge.

The amount of data your company stands to amass from an acquisition could be the reason your deal is blocked on antitrust grounds, a compliance specialist says.

As part of the whole-of-government approach President Joe Biden announced last year when he released an executive order to curb consolidation on antitrust grounds, the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies are being directed to look into companies’ data practices as part of the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) compliance process.

In a staff memo she released shortly after Biden issued his order, FTC Chair Lina Khan talked about “broadening our frame” on antitrust enforcement to include data consolidation as one of the elements regulators should scrutinize.

“We need to take a holistic approach to identifying harms,” she said.

Enforcement question

What this will look like in practice is unclear; no deal has reportedly been held up yet on data consolidation grounds, but it’s something general counsel might benefit from having on their radar screen if their company is proposing an acquisition that could result in a significant concentration of data.

“How [the data consolidation objective] gets enforced, and whether it will be enforced, is a question,” Level Legal CEO Joey Seeber told Legal Dive.

Seeber’s consultancy helps companies comply with second requests under the HSR Act. The 1976 law requires document-intensive submissions to a regulatory agency if it sees something in the initial submission that raises antitrust concerns.

Continue reading the full article here

Explore More
Close Modal

Our Framework

Understand.

During this phase, we work to step away from any assumptions and guesses about what our customers needs, and let our research findings inform our decision-making. We learn more about our customers, their problems, wants, and needs, and the environment or context in which they will use the solution we offer.

Our Framework

Define.

During the Define phase, we analyze our research findings from the Understand phase and determine what is the most important problem to solve — and why. This step defines the goal. Then we can give a clear problem statement, describing what our customers’ needs are that we are trying to solve, making sure that we heard and defined their problem correctly.

Our Framework

Solve.

This phase is an important part of the discipline in our process. People often settle for the first solution, but the most obvious solution is often not the right one. During the Solve phase, we brainstorm collaboratively with multiple stakeholders to generate many unique solutions. We then analyze our potential solutions and make choices about which are the best to pursue based on learnings in the Understand phase.

Our Framework

Build & Test.

This phase is critical in developing the right solution to our customers’ problem. An organized approach to testing can help avoid rework and create exceptional outcomes. Starting small and testing the solution, we iterate quickly, before deploying solutions across the entire project.

Our Framework

Act.

During this phase, the hard work of prior phases comes to life in our customers’ best solution. The research, collaboration, and testing performed prior to project kick-off ensure optimal results.

Our Framework

Feedback.

At the project completion, we convene all stakeholders to discuss what went well, what could have been better, and how we might improve going forward. We call these meetings “Retrospectives,” and we perform them internally as a project team, and with our external customers. The Retrospective is one of the most powerful, meaningful tools in our framework.

Next